tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7831813422886730737.post44818906575844138..comments2023-10-08T10:44:28.524+03:00Comments on Event Processing Thinking: DEBS 2012 - on Dave Maier's keynote, frames, and fragmantationOpher Etzionhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10791357917675270335noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7831813422886730737.post-46912299923492219012012-07-24T10:38:30.307+03:002012-07-24T10:38:30.307+03:00I agree with you, we often reinvent already finish...I agree with you, we often reinvent already finished discussions about CEP in the last years, even in one of the keynotes where the term "Complex Event Processing" was addressed again - what was definitely finished by an agreement in 2006 in Redwood City by the whole CEP community at the 2nd CEP Symposion (http://www.citt-online.com/downloads/2nd%20event%20processing%20symopsium.pdf and http://www.citt-online.com/index.php?id=veranstaltungen&id3=cep2&id4=more and http://www.citt-online.com/index.php?id=veranstaltungen&id3=wsor&id4=more, good times and a nice start of the CEP community!): we call it CEP, even Progess Apama and Gartner had agreed!<br />And context is also a commonly agreed concept.<br /><br />That's what I meant with the problem of industry-academia cooperation; industry is mostly not aware of the SotA and does not scientificly introduce terms and concepts.<br />Danger or a consequence is that scientists don't attend such conferences anymore, and vice versa industry does not attend highly theoretical conferences of academia. Even to separate them in an industrial track and an academia track is a problem, and - if at all - you can only do it in a big conference with a lot of participants. We will discuss it in the next days anyway.Rainer von Ammonhttp://www.citt-online.comnoreply@blogger.com