tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7831813422886730737.post8290777175708322819..comments2023-10-08T10:44:28.524+03:00Comments on Event Processing Thinking: On Event RepresentationOpher Etzionhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10791357917675270335noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7831813422886730737.post-49043899945607988502007-12-09T17:01:00.000+02:002007-12-09T17:01:00.000+02:00Thanks Harvey. I'll try to get the "disorder of t...Thanks Harvey. I'll try to get the "disorder of things" to watch the omni-potent ontology.<BR/><BR/>cheers,<BR/><BR/>OpherOpher Etzionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17070103285719046013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7831813422886730737.post-86800919573145740152007-12-08T22:03:00.000+02:002007-12-08T22:03:00.000+02:00Despite the DoD's attempt to catalog everything un...Despite the DoD's attempt to catalog everything universally (DDMS, built from Dublin Core):<BR/>http://metadata.dod.mil/mdr/irs/DDMS/<BR/>...which would include event metadata...<BR/><BR/>Some folks believe there can be no one taxonomy (or ontology) for everything (as you indicated):<BR/>http://www.amazon.com/Disorder-Things-Metaphysical-Foundations-Disunity/dp/0674212614/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1197143263&sr=8-1<BR/><BR/>...then we are forced to accept attributes or metadata from the discipline we are taking events from (weather, particle detectors, border patrol, etc.)<BR/><BR/>Beyond metadata used to describe an individual event (discipline related), I will assert that we need additional metadata to form appropriate relations with other event metadata. <BR/><BR/>It's the relationships (in my opinion) that will be of higher value than any individual event, and it's the relationships which determine if a pattern or situation is "found".<BR/><BR/>Take care,<BR/>++harveyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16159576367477007568noreply@blogger.com