In the introduction class that I am giving to my students in the event processing course I am showing a slide that explains how events relate to the rest of the universe, interestingly in this slide as first class citizens there are all the four elements identified by Forrester -- process, service, event and information, with addition of two elements - entity and context; entity is often considered to be hidden behind information which represents it, and context has not yet gained recognition as a first class citizen, although some analysts think it will become a first class citizen.
This illustration does not provide all connections among all elements, but it is an event-centric view of the universe, let's go briefly over the different connections of events to the rest of the universe:
1. Event can be related to another event - by various types of causality, by the fact that an event is included in a complex event, and by the fact that an event is a participant of the derivation function of a derived event (further discussion is here).
2. Event can be related to context - by the fact that it starts or ends context-instance, classified to context, and is created within a certain context.
3. Event can be related to service - by the fact that service can be either a producer or a consumer of an event, a service may emit events, and an event may be sent to a service, or even invoke a service.
4. Event can be related to process - by the fact that process state may be observed as event, while an event can affect (insert/modify/cancel) a process, or affect the orchestration of processes.
5. Event can relate to entity - by the fact that event references entities within a certain role; more semantic view of event processing can be done also according to relationships among entities.
6. Event has various relations to information -- it can be represented as a (kind of) information, a database operation by itself can be an event (like in active databases) and the result of derived events can be a database update action.
For Paul's question - how does CEP fit in? I agree that CEP touches all, but would not use Venn Diagrams to show the connections here.
- I view event, process, information, entity, service and context as conceptually different terms, thus there is no intersection between any two; There are relations between each pair.
- The main function of event processing is to process event, meaning take one or more events as input, do something (transform, enrich, aggregate, find pattern, derive...) and produce one or more events as output. Interestingly event processing has relations with all the six entities (I'll use EP instead of CEP, since I am using the CEP according to its glossary definition and not according to the "marketing" definition - see discussion here)
1. EP consumes and produces events.
2. EP executes within context that determines what will be executed.
4. EPN is a kind of process - but cannot be managed by typical BPM tools due to the different scheme of routing, it can also interact with processes.
5. Entities are not explicitly part of EP, although some type of processing may also process dependencies among entities.
6. EP has various interactions with information - same as events.
Note that sometime conceptually there are activities on the borderline between event processing and other terms, for example - the action to determine what should be done with an event on the consumer side, can be done as part of EP system, or as part of the consumer software - depends on the level of coupling between them.
More - including discussion how does the term situation fits in this game - later.